Santander: Sorry, it’s xCurrent, not XRP and xRapid, for One Pay FX

0
20

Well, there are several advantages of using xRapid, a tool
that uses XRP as a bridge for liquidity purposes. Aside from lightning speed
and efficiency, there are cost aspects where unlike exorbitant charges of SWIFT,
xRapid’s are in mere cents, near negligible, giving it an edge over centralized
systems. Albeit the advantages, there is this confusion that the tool is a
separate platform from xCurrent; Ripple Inc most adopted solution that “enables banks to instantly settle cross-border payments with
end-to-end tracking” minus XRP.

If anything, xRapid is a tool that is compatible with xCurrent
because every xRapid payment use xCurrent payment rails to settle transactions.
This ability was introduced after Ripple announced the upgrade of xCurrent to
version 4.0. The version was said to be in use by large banking clients and
would expand XRP usage now that banks or payment processors who decide to
upgrade would automatically benefit from liquidity provided by xRapid.

As advantageous as it is, a majority of the more than 200
banks, processors and financial institutions plugged in to the RippleNet are
hesitant to upgrade. Of the +200 banks, only 13 are using xRapid and a standout
is Mercury FX. The company recently announced that they were processing
thousands of transactions via xRapid.

Mercury FX Leading by Example

According to Alastair Constance and as reported by Decrypt Media, the
company managed to process a whopping $1 billion through its London office and
$1.8 billion globally. These payments were mostly likely from the Mexico, Philippines
payment corridor where by working with Ripple’s endorsed crypto exchanges in
Bitso and coins.ph, users can instantaneously send money in seconds. This is
what Constance said:

“We are steaming ahead, to be honest, and we are looking for more jurisdictions and more flow to the jurisdictions we’ve already opened up. We are working very closely with [Mexico and the Philippines] on opening up new channels and are very keen to move very fast but it’s difficult when you’re building a new network.”

Ramessa Online Hesitant, Santander using xCurrent

However, like before, tough regulations around cryptocurrencies and capital controls is challenging. But it is not Mercury FX that is waiting for regulatory clarity. Other processors are on the side and using xCurrent via RippleNet for efficacy. We reported earlier that Ramessa Online with bases in Brazil won’t use xRapid until when there is clarity. While admitting that they “plan to expand to XRP sometime in the near future”, they were cautious as they “need to be compliant with legislation.”

It is the same route that Banco Santander is following despite connecting via the RippleNet. Their remittance service, Santander One Pay FX, is blockchain based–of which Ana Botín, Executive Chairman of Banco Santander said offers “tremendous opportunities to improve their services” and “available to retail customers in Spain, UK, Brazil and Poland.”

The post Santander: Sorry, it’s xCurrent, not XRP and xRapid, for One Pay FX appeared first on Ethereum World News.

Suggested Posts